Five-Step Decision Making Process Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Five-Step Decision Making Process - Essay Example In case of recruitment and selection, ethical decision making plays a vital role to find the best candidate for the designation under consideration. However, there are a number of ways in which the decisions are deteriorated by other staff, family members, friends, relatives and existing employees. Human resource managers need to carefully formulate their criteria to the selection process. Every candidate should be assessed according to the qualification, skills, interview results and experience rather than on the basis of his reference or source. This paper evaluates the given scenario applying The 5 steps Process for Making Ethical Decisions. The five step process which guide towards making an ethical decision regarding issues in the business starts from the identification of the problem. In the given scenario, there is a clear indication of possible unethical judgment due to personal interest and influence of others. The co-worker’s statement may affect the decision of the hiring process. The problem of unethical and unjust decisions may harm the reputation of the company and such a decision may also not be in the best interest of the business. It is firstly unethical to reject candidates who best suit the position under consideration. ... The second step is to identify the alternative choice that a person can take. Applying it on the given scenario there are three main alternatives I can take: 1. Hire the best candidate 2. Leap back and give the power of selection to other senior 3. Hire that candidate which is friend of my co-worker The identification of the alternatives alone is not sufficient to help in making an ethical decision. It is now required to evaluate the alternatives in order to select the best possible candidate for the position. If I go for the first choice and do hire the best candidate then my colleague would take it wrongly and it may affect our relationship. But the best candidate can be a valuable asset to our organization. As a responsible employee of my organization it is the best choice for me. If I select the second option and leap back and delegate or request the selection to be done by other individual say my senior then however my colleague would still be dissatisfied with me but still it w ould not harm the relationship much in the long run. Finally, if I do hire that candidate which is a friend of my colleague then both the organization needs and my colleague would be satisfied. I personally believe that I should go for the best candidate for the designation under consideration in terms of qualifications, experience and skills. This will be a bit difficult to satisfy the co-worker; however, it will help the organization run successfully in the long run. Job of hiring is a very bonafide job and it requires higher level of professional skepticism. Hiring is the process which must display greater level of ethical decision making. It will be unethical to avoid any